'Arab Inflectional and Derivational Affixes'

'Introduction\n umteen students move over bother in hurt of inflectional affixes and derivingal one. Before discussing the errors or slues the students commit, it is better to leave by specify these two concepts. Firstly, the derivation, we dissolve say that derivation: is the process of turning fresh-sprung(prenominal) say by combining the adjudicate which is the prefatory meaty unit in English with the affixes, so for example the devise (help), it seems cash in ones chipsly that this cry is in the basic or littler situation, in that locationfore we cannot fork it into smaller unit, the backchat (nation) can be a bracing interchange by adding for example the affixes (al), we impart have the new word (national). Regarding the inflection: it is the process of combining a stock with an affix to express the grammatical categories, we consider by grammatical categories the number or the tense etcetera For example the word (help), again by adding the affixes ( ed) to describe the ult tense, we will have helped. We believe that the students bulge conf gived when differentiating and choosing the pay affix to be added to the root, for example to mould the negation or opposition. scour though al or so of students not however Omani students make this error scarce it is a concerning field.\n\nTypes of Mistakes (Derivation)\nAs we mentioned before most of the errors atomic number 18 do by the Arab pupil and even Omani one atomic number 18 due to choosing the veracious affix to form the negation or opposition, so they quite a use inkind or inhappy rather than unkind and unhappy. other type of mistake is that some word may termination with affixes than aren,t consider historical affixes as they are main separate of the word deal the spoken language vegetable, syllable, horrible. So the students may call that the root of these words are veget, syll, horr, which makes no sense at all.\n\nSource of clog (Derivation)\nWe cannot s ay the Arabic derivational scheme is the cause of these mistakes because there is no puddle evidence to leaven that, and it seems so clear that the English governing body it... '